• quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Since when? last i checked you get one page with the most popular results for the query, and the rest is unrelated recommendations

    • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hadn’t thought about this, but you may be on to something. I had a car issue, googled it, found nothing but crap and generic articles. I searched the same on YouTube and found a couple videos about fixing the exact issue on my type of car.

      Really interesting observation.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The trouble with that is that videos are much harder to reference than text. If someone slaps a [citation needed] on a claim I’m making, I may have to track down the video, find the right time stamp, and link that. And then they will probably say that YouTube isn’t a valid source, even if it comes from a relatively reputable creator (I’ve had people say this for a Tom Scott video where he was interviewing a subject matter expert in the topic).

        This is all so much easier with blogs. Even if people should be a little more skeptical of blogs, at least a blog can link its own sources more easily than YouTube to get to something more reputable.