• notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be clear, I am absolutely in favour of public transport in towns, cities, suburban area and everywhere around them that it can be reasonably spread to, and on routes between them. As you say, that’ll cover the significant majority of the population, but we still need roads for things like last mile freight, and those of us who need to get places not served.

    I lived in a major city for 20 years, and only bothered to get a car in the last few, when I had more need to travel to places outside the city, that weren’t served.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      we still need roads

      strawman argument. No one has proposed removing all roads.

      • notabot@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The comment I was replying to suggested stopping catering to rural populations. I was trying to respond to that, as having roads is one of the main ways of catering for them. I suppose they could be talking about this like subsidies to fossil fuels, but that doesn’t really address the earlier assertion that EVs are a stop gap.