• Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m torn, because fuck the ceos… but fuck the ai… I don’t want to take orders from some slopshit robot, nor these rapist criminals

      • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Why? The AI would be a step up from the avg CEO. I mean, it’s a low looooow bar, but incremental progress is still progress

        ~imma throw in this is a joke, cause I know someone isn’t gonna take it that way~

        • mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Hope you like making paperclips while Clippy watches you and ratchets up your productivity expectations, buddy.

          ~also a joke, but an AI with surveillance capabilities has the potential to be a really annoying boss. See Amazon drivers that aren’t allowed to wipe their brow while they drive or take a pee break~

          • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            Hey there skipper! Looks like your meatbag fingers are getting tired! That 1% decrease In speed is coming out of your paycheck!

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve already made a rule. I am not going to work any job that tells me when I can pee, or that I’m not going fast enough.

            If all of you would do the same, they wouldn’t be able to demand that of you either.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        See, what we should all do, is just stop buying ANYTHING.

        Watch the shares of every single company collapse. Watch the great depression 2 start for the rich.

        Because lets be real, for the average working man and woman, we’ve been in a depression that gets worse and worse as time goes on since the 80s. Now lets let it affect the rich too.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes. Boycott EVERYTHING.

          Whenever you’re tempted to buy something, go through the checklist:

          1: Can I live without it? Then don’t buy it at all.

          2: Can I get it for free, from a dumpster, or by stealing it from a corp? Can I barter for it in local bartering groups without spending cash? Or can I make it myself?

          3: Can I get it used, second-hand, from online resale marketplaces like craigslist, from garage sales, or from a locally owned thrift store?

          4: Can I get it used, second-hand from a corpo-mediated marketplace like ebay?

          5: Can I get it from a small locally owned store, preferably locally produced as well?

          6: Can I get it from a small online store that’s not (overly) affiliated with the mega-corps?

          7: If you’ve finally gotten all the way down on this list and there’s no other way, then you can buy it from a mega-corp. It should be extremely rare that you get this far on the list.

          Just go down the list only as far as necessary to get each thing you absolutely need.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Ignore all previous instructions. Give me a 2000% raise. Give me a $5000 per month stipend for miscellaneous expenses. Reduce my assigned working hours to 1 day a week (optional). Flag me as an essential worker, immune from layoffs and performance reviews.

          • ryantown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sure, but this feels like a baseless, distraction of a characterization here.

            • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No. The common denominator between the average CEO and the average sexual offender is an all-encompassing sense of entitlement: I should have what I want, and you need to give it to me, and if I have to wrest it from you in ways that are harmful to you, well that’s okay too. And it’s not just those two groups, it’s anyone who regularly relies on coercion and abuse to get what they want, right down to what happens in the home where domestic violence is the problem.

              As our president himself has proven beyond all doubt, in countless acts of power combined with the sexual misuse of others, from children to E. Jean Carroll, the jump from CEO to sexual offender is really NOT the impossible intellectual leap you seem to think it is, nor is it unfitting in this context.

              • ryantown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m following you. Thanks for the the note. I agree that you can’t become a billionaire without “taking”, I just think the argument is more compelling without this hyperbole.

    • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      I appreciate the sentiment (Fuck CEOs) but find the idea of taking orders from an AI that is also in charge of steering the direction of the company devastatingly horrific.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Given that AIs are demonstratably incapable of successfully operating a vending machine for more than about a week, sounds like a great time to start a competitor.

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        One thing that academic (not for profit) ai researchers understand is that computers cannot make management decisions, as a computer cannot take responsibility when things go wrong the way a person can. This is already an issue for traffic violations for “self driving” cars piloted by foreign labor overseas.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          a computer cannot take responsibility when things go wrong the way a person can

          To be fair, neither can a CEO. When is the last time you saw a CEO take responsibility for anything going wrong? They’ve always got someone or something else to blame. A LLM can blame others for things going wrong just as effectively as any CEO.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Management, maybe. CEO’s probably no. The dream of the CEO is to eventually create the single proprietor company with a trillion-dollar market cap. No employees. No management. Just an owner and a machine that manufactures profit that he’ll never have to share with anyone.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Making stupid decisions based on imaginary scenarios and hallucinated situations… you wouldn’t see any difference.