• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The rocket equation is a bitch.
    If you want to accelerate close to c, brake at earth, then do the same thing again on the way back, you’ll need to carry a planet mass worth of fuel at launch, just to propel a small craft.
    And then you still haven’t done anything productive in our solar system.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The rocket equation assumes you need to bring all your fuel with you.

      But with things like laser-propelled light sails, you might be able to propel the ship with energy the ship doesn’t need to carry.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Look at Bussard Ramjet. Why would you carry your fuel with adequately advanced technology (let alone zero point quantum stuff)

      Shields are much more interesting near c.

        • sunnie@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Any problem is solvable with unlimited energy at your disposal. Protons are charged so you divert them with an electric field. If you’re using a ramjet for propulsion, you collect them to fuse. The incoming velocity could be a benefit there.