zedgeist@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 hours agowe're so smollemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down14
arrow-up1304arrow-down1imagewe're so smollemmy.worldzedgeist@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 hours agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareRoy Brander🍁@urbanists.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours ago@zedgeist True, but somebody could do a cool count-up “clock” like the “debt clock” that would count the stars that have heard our transmissions, so far. Call the start 1926, though we had some largish transmitters earlier. By '26, I think they were all over the world, broadcasting every direction. So call it 100ly, and get a count, then advance by 1ly/yr. The number of stars would go up as the cube of time.
@zedgeist
True, but somebody could do a cool count-up “clock” like the “debt clock” that would count the stars that have heard our transmissions, so far.
Call the start 1926, though we had some largish transmitters earlier. By '26, I think they were all over the world, broadcasting every direction.
So call it 100ly, and get a count, then advance by 1ly/yr. The number of stars would go up as the cube of time.