hamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up1637arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1627arrow-down1external-linkFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comhamburgheftig@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square144fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·23 hours agoI know it’s code. You are missing the point. Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·22 hours agoThat’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong. Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-216 hours agoYou missed the context. I don’t blame you. Tell me how in hell are you going to audit every single variation of code generated by a LLM, that’s equivalent to a whole library. I’ll wait.
I know it’s code. You are missing the point.
Any library with a critical user mass is auditable, because a fraction of those users would take the time to do so, whereas all LLM generated variations of the same library cannot and will never be auditable.
That’s literally not what you said, you said “LLM code can not be auditable” which is demonstrably wrong.
Go ahead and move the goal posts though.
You missed the context. I don’t blame you.
Tell me how in hell are you going to audit every single variation of code generated by a LLM, that’s equivalent to a whole library. I’ll wait.