• mabeledo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      And I suspect your position comes from not doing any due diligence on the matter.

      Funny that you call mine “ideological” though, since you are the one making claims without any substance, e.g. “it’s only going to get better”. How could you even know? Not even researchers at the very edge do. There have been concerns about the future availability and quality of data. Plenty of researchers have come forward pointing that poisoning a LLM is exceedingly easy. Really, how do you know that “it’s going to get better”? Explain that to me. What do you know that everybody else doesn’t?

      How do you even know that AI, as we know it, it’s going to be revolutionary in the near future? Most people only know of technology successes because of survivorship bias, but I’ve been through several revolutions that faded out. How is this one different? And why would you think you’re right, when not even expert researchers are sure?

      • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve already provided two references. Please feel free to post the link supporting that AI has no influence in medicine.

        • mabeledo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You haven’t answered a single one of my questions.

          I’m going to assume that you fell for the hype and know nothing of what you’re talking about.