• danciestlobster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I mean I don’t hate it but it needs some workshopping. Why just the one richest person? Why not the 20 richest? Also, forced charity donation is a bit problematic since the wealthy all have their own sham charities. Use the money to fund free healthcare instead, im sure it would be well more than enough.

    • borQue@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Agreed! Those are great adaptations!

      Let’s finetune it to the 20 richest, that’ll be about 90% of the total wealth in America. With that in mind the first show will be one of the best, I think :-)

      And you’re totally right: they cannot have any say in the destination of their “voluntary” donation!

      -Healthcare, yes, but also -Education, -Starter money for the best 100 benefit-to-humanity starting companies, -Let say a lucky 1000 people who get 1 million (just to make sure that the viewing figures are nothing less than 100% :-)) -Save 1000 people who can be cured by medicines which were made idiot egoist expensive… -1000 Widows who lost their husband because of some stupid-moron-war get 1000 Dollar every month for the rest of their lifes…

      Maybe in the months before the broadcast a few episodes with voting sessions for these destinations? And then still we’ll probably have 50% of the total wealth left…

      I’m starting to look forward to it! I fart proudly in the general direction of the narrowminded losers who tried to ban me!