• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think a better explaination would be the left should use this as a reason to defund the police.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t see how that would fly with a public fed up with resource starved policing. You can’t even get them to show up for a burglary.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          Resource starved police???

          A small town police force has a literal tank for a city of less than 40,000. They’re CONSTANTLY getting swat level gear and equipment.

          They’re not resource starved. They’re just bad at their jobs.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Could it be that America’s problems are not the same as Britain’s problems? A town of 40,000 may not even have a police station, and would statistically be covered by less than 100 officers split over shifts, including administrators and specialists, and they may be 20 miles away when the call comes in.

            In my largely rural county of 700,000, policing levels may be as low as 40 on some shifts, with 1/5 of officers planning to quit in the next 2 years. There are typically 2 cars with armed response officers.

        • pohart@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          IIRC They never did. They voted to, but then increased police funding before implementing it.