Not only does this disincentivize HR from running fake vacancies or stringing multiple candidates on just to keep their options open, but it also solves the problem of unemployed people job-searching effectively working full-time for free. The fact that companies would have to pay to hire workers would mean they try to make the selection as short and effective as possible.

Edit: From the business POV:

  • Businesses would have a limited budget for hiring so would limit process to 10 applicants and would have to pick those randomly. Less time spent on interviewing but also might miss the ideal candidate. Although the difference would fall sharply with larger pools.
  • And 000s of people now stuck wo any appls at all (although better than writing fake, futile appls), and no money. Not enough jobs on the market would translate into not enough paying applications for them to be able to substitute unemployment benefits.

Edit: this post seems to have gained some traction. Do you think I should try writing to my MP and suggesting it? I live in the UK where fake interviews are a real problem right now

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    This sounds viable until you consider what the application process will devolve into.

    The initial screening process will become even more annoying which will cause more bot applications and in return it will get even more annoying.

    We have a massive government mandate that requires that you apply for a large number of jobs in order to qualify for unemployment benefits.

    We have job agencies who are incentivised to place candidates, any candidates, with no penalties for incorrect placement.

    We have unpaid internships that normalise free work for hire in the most susceptible population, job entrants.

    We have automated processes run by HR to weed out unsuitable applicants before the actual employer sees anything.

    We have technically unqualified HR departments demanding qualifications for things that don’t exist without any controls by the actual employer.

    This idea won’t address any of this, and I think it will make things worse.

    E: spelling

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Easy solution. The company is allowed 1 free 30 minute phone call to both verify basic resume details and to schedule a lengthy interview.

      Takes care of the bot issue, and a 30 minute phone call is less of a burden on the applicant