A year has passed since Commodore, the computer brand many of you know and love, came back from the dead under new ownership. The comeback is picking up pace too, with a lineup that already includes multiple Commodore 64 Ultimate editions, a C64X PC, and a licensing program that invites outside builders to use the name. Now, they have announced a return to the phone market, and not in the doomscrolling glass-slab avatar we are all used to, but in a retro, very equippable flip phone format…

  • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This phone should cost $150 max. What’s with dumb phones charging smart phone levels of money?

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They are definitely charging way too much, the price and the browser block are the only reasons I am not buying one. I think they could reasonably price it at $250 based on the hardware and that it will certainly be a low production run which massively increases the price. Also, that Sony with SailfishOS is both old (it was released over five years ago) and refurbished, not exactly a fair comparison.

    • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Higher end camera and a HD DAC (maybe high power audio output?)

      Those sorta things are expensive

      Also it runs 99% of android apps

      Probably also a low volume product which increases price

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I love how people throw around “it’s too expensive”. But did you ever try developing a relatively small batch gadget for the market? Plus as others said, it’s not a dumbp phone at all.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Being too expensive doesn’t mean they are necessarily gouging. My wife crochets blankets as a hobby, but she’d have to charge a stupid amount to sell them at a profit if she used decent yarn and valued her time at even minimum wage. Said blanket would be “too expensive” without a doubt.

      • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Isn’t there a whole lot of small volume ‘phone’ companies that are charging far less? Nothing Phone, or the plethora of Chinese companies like Unihertz come to mind.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Agree, was thinking the same thing. I would have considered it at that price…

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      its an initial offer model and it does look to have lots of modern tech components in it

      the price seems reasonable to me, especially if its got a designer edge to it