• Reygle@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Ironically people who “btw I use Arch” have been FREAKING OUT because their precious arch user repository got massively infected with infostealer malware, lol

    This was just this week

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nobody is freaking out who isn’t a moron.

      There are a handful of arch users who eat crayons… if the windows users in 2026 leave any I mean.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      22 hours ago

      precious arch user repository

      I think you vastly overestimate the importance of AUR. A lot of Arch users had to say something about the incident and many of them didn‘t even use it. It‘s definitely nothing essential.

      Also Arch users still don‘t give a fuck about Windows. This whole AUR debacle has little to do with what OP was actually getting at.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Maybe so. I use cachy just for the record, so I’m not piling on with linux hate. I’m just enjoying the madness of it all. :)

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          FYI, CachyOS is Arch based. It has access to the AUR. If you weren’t effected, that proves the point.

          The AUR is a repository of last resort. It’s useful, but you should be careful. That’s true even before this even. It’s a repository made by users, and is not verified.

    • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I use arch (kinda), and has zero issues. It was a problem if you used unmaintained packages from arch, as adopting them and contaminating then was the attack vector. Using someone that’s unmaintained is always kinda questionable, so instead I’d just manually install that instead (it shouldn’t change if it isn’t maintained anyway).

    • imjustmsk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      lmao, but yea- lesson learned anyway 🥀 never will install random packages without properly checking it, Got too carried away by "yay -Essing everything :sob:

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The Windows equivalent of this would basically be the discovery that a bunch of apps on the Microsoft Store were infected with malware.

      This really sucks for people that migrated to Linux without becoming Linux experts, and chose a friendly distro based on Arch that came with the AUR, like the often-recommended CachyOS.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The packages on the AUR are all user created. It’s not really comparable to the Microsoft Store.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Is the Microsoft Store not full of apps not created by Microsoft?

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              And the AUR is not currently accepting registrations, so some degree of vetting is clearly happening in both cases. I don’t know how stringent for either.

              This wasn’t supposed to be a perfect one to one comparison, just an interesting sidenote lol

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I think they’re currently taking extra precautions, because of this event. I don’t think they were vetting users before. Regardless, it’s significantly less controlled than the Microsoft store. The equivalent of that is the official repository, not the user repository.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                That’s like saying that github is equivalent to the Microsoft store. Sure, they provide the space for the repository. It’s controlled by users though, as the name implies. It isn’t the official repository, like the Microsoft store is the official “repository” for Windows.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        There is a reason why the arch community had such a bad reputation when it came to newcomers, they were gate keeping good technical knowledge of the system. It had the side effect that most people became royal dicks on the forums and stopped being helpful, but it did have what I would consider the intended effect of people being wary of everything they did on their system.

        I find the easy arch distros to be fairly interesting since my recommendation has always been that anyone who wants to daily drive an arch distro should install arch through command line at least once and read about the packages they use. I personally run endeavor os, but I started by doing the leg work, which led me to the conclusion that I prefer flatpaks over aur if it is available because they are far more easier to maintain good security practices on.

        • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I think that’s a silly thing to say given that the arch wiki is the most comprehensive source of up to date technical Linux knowledge available to everybody. If you mean support for people on the distro itself, it does explicitly market itself to people who are already knowledgeable and willing to be their own support, so idk what you’d expect

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        CachyOS is completely 100% unaffected UNLESS people chose to install applications from the AUR.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Which is honestly just as hilarious, because I use Ubuntu just trigger Arch nerds.

      Couldn’t happen to a nicer group of people.