• bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        At 2% it would hurt those who hold bonds at 3.9% (and below) and when there is a planned 2% inflation rate. (The economy is usually better for the working class when bonds average between 2-5% returns).

        But I agree that it should be global.

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          The 2% would be applied to households worth 100 million dollars or more, I’m pretty sure they could spare the change without much impact on their lifestyles.

          • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why not make it go, 1%, 2%,4%,8%,16%,32%,64% based on how much they had? Hurting the trillionaire and the centibillionaires the hardest

            • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              The goal is to have it low enough so that every single country in the world agrees to set it up, even tax havens like Bermuda, Luxembourg or Monaco. But high enough to be effective. Then, once it’s agreed upon, we can make it better and more progressive.