Humans evolved to pay close attention to danger, but today that instinct is being overwhelmed by an endless supply of bad news from around the world. Researchers say the answer isn’t to stop following current events—it’s to build healthier habits around how, when, and where we get our news.

  • MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve largely stopped actively following news because

    • most of it is stuff we knew already
    • I already find out all that I need to know and more involuntarily through occasional social media visits

    I’d like to read summaries of a given week’s news on the world, EU, national, and maybe local level once a week, tho. I’ll check if there’s anything like this for the world and EU scale and report back here if there is.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Its wild to see people type “this news isnt good for my mental health”. Like ignoring the planet dying is a price well paid for personal mental wellness. I guess we are doomed as a species. Its really humbling to learn our limits to change things.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is a problem I struggle with philosophically. I have lived in the US with a degree of privilege and I feel the price for that should include knowing how the proverbial sausage is made, that is, knowing all the crap that is being done to allow me to live in (meager) comfort.

    It’s Poor Things cranked up to eleven. The British empire is holding the beer of the American one. It’s just too much.

    The continual rush of news, propelled by the addictive properties of the YouTube algo, have driven me quite mad, albeit, I suffer from behavioral health problems already. I haven’t found a balance to this.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m not sure I understand what “build healthier habits around how, when and where we get our news” exactly means and how that would help. I mean if TACO drops bombs on little kids, I can’t think of how digesting this differently is going to be any healthier for me.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Spending an hour a day reading news from reputable sources is a lot healthier than doomscrolling questionable content for 8 hours on Reddit and Instagram.

    • Anthea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What is the question here? You take kids to do your work?! Die! You even just slightly have sexual dreams about kids?! Die twice! Kids must be protected and sadly that doesn’t happen as much as you think. Anyhow.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      One thing I see a lot is the same event repackaged repeatedly with various headlines from different angles to elicit despair and outrage. If you heard about it once already, that is probably enough.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It means that you are not in control of any of it. You can’t impact any of it meaningfully as a single force, at least in real time. People used to watch a “news hour” once a day. You could artificially recreate that, and then detatch for the other 23 hours using self control, muted phone notifications and browser filter extensions. And maybe your brain will thank you.

      Of course you could have a separate rule for local alerts that may be more relevant, but local news is dying unfortunately, soo… You could probably just check in once a week to see how the surviving local paper verbatim reprints favorable press releases from the city’s PR person that they retain from the local municipal consultant group with a forgettable acronym.

  • flameleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Switching from Reddit to Lemmy did wonders for my mental health. Less time doom scrolling, more time to engage with my hobbies

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I feel the opposite, my feed is almost entirely people describing how the world is falling apart, how communism is good but not that communism, and Linux

      • specimen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Absolutely, lemmy has such a downer vibe to it, it’s not doing me any good using this platform lately.

        • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Voyager has the ability to filter anything you want, the moment you see some toxic bad news you can remove a keyword. The only reason I haven’t banned .world outright is because there are meme channels

        • MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          We need more jokes around Lemmy, this is all communism this and that gays blahblahblah trump yapyapyap, holy cow. Sometimes I can’t help but doomscroll on Reddit, missing the community and the jokes and the friends I had there.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The gaming communities here are somehow even more miserable than reddit. I need different hobbies clearly.

  • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I got tired of this and started a nonprofit, it in turn attracted a following and now we spend our time doing good instead of reading doom news all the time, and it’s turned my mental state around considerably.

    All you need is a little bit of info about org formation and leadership, and a lot of righteous indignation about the current state of things.

    And yes before anyone asks I do think almost anyone could do this or at very least join one.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    And the people who are in charge and doing evil things know this and are using it to their advantage.

  • Dreamer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Maybe if we stopped letting bad things happen, there wouldn’t be so much bad news.

  • TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Isn’t this the thing we are doing by being on Lemmy? My mental state is better when I scroll the feed here, as opposed to scrolling reddit.

    I do both still, but I’m nearing the phase where Lemmy gets more attention.

    It’s just fucked that I read too much so I might run out of content on Lemmy which pushes me to read the news then back to reddit untill I wake up again

  • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I find my days to be much better overall when I don’t spend a lot of time online over an extended period. I’m more productive, more creative, and less anxious. I still find out all the impactful stuff, anyway.

    Its not like knowing the bad news as it happens helps me in any way, genuinely, so why bother wasting all my bandwidth on it?

    My dumb monkey brain is meant to tell five kinds of poisonous berries from the one edible kind. What does it do with an international pedophile ring, climate collapse, and rising inequality? Shuts down is what it does.

        • sniggleboots@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I just took issue with the very literal interpretation of the phrase “not designed for” and I couldn’t hold my tongue

          well, my fingers, I guess

          • MohamedMoney@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Is it? I’d guess ‘to evolve to do smth’ doesn’t necessarily need to be teleological. IIRC the verb ‘evolve’ means the fittest getting randomly selected, no?

            I think I understand where you’re coming from but I think it’s fundamentally different to ‘being designed with a specific goal in mind’

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 minutes ago

              Evolved into or evolved with may reduce the implication of an intention.

              • Our brains evolved into structures capable of supporting complex language.
              • Our brains evolved with the capacity for complex language.
      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah I dunno about design as much as iterative adaptations over incomprehensibly large periods of time.

      • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Evolution did as much design as my socks design themselves to stay in their drawer. Evolution doesn’t design, it works with what it has and nothing else. It doesn’t even optimize because optimization requires choosing between options with intent. Evolution has zero intentions. Evolution creates un-“optimized” things that go extinct all the time, but it’s not because it “failed” at designing because that implies it “tried” to design, but because it’s not a designer, it can’t design. No design made fish have legs. No design gave elephants their tusks and no design gave flies their wings. Evolution won’t ‘design’ new vertebrae segments, but they still might happen—it just won’t be because of any design.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Natural selection is actually technically an optimisation algorithm. Its just a kind of crappy one that only ever finds local maximas because it can’t traverse valleys (the thing just dies). So we end up with optical receptors on the wrong side of our retina. Ooof.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Healthier habits?” They can’t even do that for going to bed because they’re doomscrolling/texting in bed.