• Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds like changing definitions to me.

    But it’s not. It’s a hypothesis that was proven incorrect by running the experiment.

    That’s translatable to other fields

    I didn’t say it doesn’t ever translate to other fields. I said that it doesn’t need to. That’s the difference between narrow and general intelligence. You can be superhuman at X but have zero clue how to do Y. It’s still intelligence but it’s not general or “human level”