As a longtime member of the 3D-printing community, I'm alarmed by new legislation targeting the digital files, platforms, and machines that create weapons. It raises a powerful question: Who decides what can be made?
I was talking about gun market share. Not in the sense that 3D printing is taking today their share but big corps could easily be scared of future tech accessible at home or innovation not made by them. 3D printer/CNC… is changing and innovating so quick, so big Corps blocking access as early as possible makes sens to ensure corps will stay dominant and no new competitors.
PS: my english must be really shitty, you are the third person to mention something i have not said :/
I was talking about gun market share. Not in the sense that 3D printing is taking today their share but big corps could easily be scared of future tech accessible at home or innovation not made by them. 3D printer/CNC… is changing and innovating so quick, so big Corps blocking access as early as possible makes sens to ensure corps will stay dominant and no new competitors.
PS: my english must be really shitty, you are the third person to mention something i have not said :/