• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve heard of the stats; I’m just curious how they address it and how much better (or worse) similar storage with hydro and pumps would be.

    • r3plic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, this 80% efficiency is what they are targeting not what the system will do. The test system Energy Vault build in a MUCH smaller form factor had a round-trip efficency of 75%

      The EVx ™ system is projected to achieve an impressive round-trip efficiency exceeding 80%. Source

      Only time will tell if they can reach 80% with a bigger system or at all. If they actually manage this it would be a decent alternative to Hydrodams in areas where these are just not possible since it would be a similar round-trip efficency.

      Pumped storage systems have a round-trip efficiency of about 80%, which is competitive with battery storage. Source

      In my opinion these systems are inferior to fly wheel energy storage (can reach up to 90% round trip efficency Source) but might still be an option depending on price.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pumped hydro almost always will make more sense because, for one, we’ve got pumps and pumping, and water storage VERY figured out. And water storage, well. Thats just a great co-benefit to have from the system.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fly wheels are pretty cool too, it could be that this is just easier to build and maintain though. I imagine the primary considerations are around how cheap it is to produce and whether it holds enough energy to make it worthwhile.