JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoInfinite Loopprogramming.devimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1imageInfinite Loopprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squarejubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoProject A: Has 6 different implementations of the same complex business logic. Project B: Has one implementation of the complex business logic… But it’s ALL in one function with 17 arguments and 1288 lines of code. “The toast always lands the buttered side down.”
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoProject B is just called neural network
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoActually, I bet you could implement that in less. You should be able to legibly get several weights in one line.
minus-squareTheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOnly 1288 lines? Can I raise you a 6000+ lines stored procedure that calls to multiple different sql functions that each implements a slightly different variation of the same logic?
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAre there triggers in the sql database? It’s too easy otherwise
Project A: Has 6 different implementations of the same complex business logic.
Project B: Has one implementation of the complex business logic… But it’s ALL in one function with 17 arguments and 1288 lines of code.
“The toast always lands the buttered side down.”
Project B is just called neural network
Actually, I bet you could implement that in less. You should be able to legibly get several weights in one line.
Only 1288 lines? Can I raise you a 6000+ lines stored procedure that calls to multiple different sql functions that each implements a slightly different variation of the same logic?
Are there triggers in the sql database? It’s too easy otherwise