• NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Its weird that he really was on the forefront once because he did physical effects with interesting camera shots. it felt new and different.

    AI is not going to give you that, it will suck. CGI sucks already too.

    Oh well not like he is relevant. A new hope was at least interesting, but its been nothing after that anyways.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      He used what was available at the time. For the original trilogy, that was practical effects.

      The prequel trilogy was a bit more… Dodgy thanks to eagerly embraced CGI that wasn’t fully baked yet.

      People famously critiqued the reworked original trilogy due to various dubious creative tweaks. Like waking on Jabba and Jabba just having a funny reaction instead of how you would expect him to react.

    • kaotic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Not going to get into the AI debate; I will agree that BAD CGI sucks; there’s so much CGI you never even notice and without it the scenes would be horrible. The main reason “CGI sucks” is because of the shift to go with the lowest bidder who’s then forced to work under horrific timelines and unable to actually do good work. CGI itself doesn’t suck, but it absolutely can when done by a low bidder in 1/4 of the time it needs.

      https://youtu.be/bL6hp8BKB24

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Funny he uses Michael bay as an example in that video. Nothing will put me to sleep faster than a Michael bay movies effects.

        I get your point though, it’s a tool when used artistically and with skill can be fine.