• Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    More that they are destroying the books in the process of digitizing them, they basically cut the pages out of the book and feed them into a scanner with a document feeder attached.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s worth pointing out that this is standard practice when digitising books in most places, if they’re not irreplaceable. Mass-produced books would fall under that category.

      Turning the page and photographing what’s there is really only done for some books, which you can’t afford to destroy.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        From what I’ve read previously, they’re destroying all the books, regardless if they’re historic and one-of-a-kind or a mass produced paperback.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          At least in this case, yes. They’d just not get them, since they’d want something they can already easily process, and the source for the quote is a bookseller, who isn’t likely to sell something like that to begin with.

          An old book that might disintegrate and damage the scanner and hold things up would be undesirable, compared to either a new one, or a reprint of an old one.

          • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            That’s not how most of that works.

            Things would be sold in bulk. Mistakes happen. Literally the only part of what you said that makes any sense is that fucked up pages could clog the pipe.