• inzen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use fish because it was the default in cachyos and decided to give it a fair shake. I like the built in syntax highlighting and fancy autocomplete but I miss bash scripting and built in commands that replace standard commands can be weird sometimes. I have not tried scripting fish, to lazy to learn yet another scripting language, especially if bash is the (almost) de-facto standard.

    • lapping6596@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve been using it for awhile now for the same reason, and think I’m going to switch back to sh as it has too many suggestions which I read and it interrupts my thoughts and slows me down.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I like having fish as an option, but don’t think I’d ever use it as my default.

      If I have a long command that uses long filenames, or I don’t remember the syntax of something, I can just type “fish” and it’ll open up a fish shell.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can always just continue using bash scripting, with a bash shebang in your scripts, if you miss it

      • Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s what I do. Fish is great as interactive shell, scripts don’t benefit that much from it and I can use what’s familiar.