• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 小时前

    In the same vein, this is partly why I’ve never understood the mindset of individual investors. Like, it’s extremely arrogant to seriously believe that you have an edge over highly resourced institutions and billionaire investors who can afford the best analysts and mathematical models on top of their market influence. I can assure you that whatever strategy you have, theirs is better, and they don’t have to play by the same rules. What can you hope to bring to the table when you’re swimming with these sharks?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 小时前

      who can afford the best analysts and mathematical models on top of their market influence.

      Why bother with that when you can just do a little inside trading during the next child raping party?

    • Sims@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 小时前

      What can you hope to bring to the table when you’re swimming with these sharks?

      …more food…

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 小时前

      Some folks like to gamble! More and more people are desperation gambling these days out of doomer mindsets that see 0dtes and kalshi bets as their way out of crushing poverty.

      And here and there, it’s possible to look at pricing and conclude it’s pants-on-head bananas. Trading and therefore price action is dominated by algorithms which amplifies hype cycles. Who couldn’t see SpaceX as being overvalued? Other than the assholes at NASDAQ

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 小时前

        And here and there, it’s possible to look at pricing and conclude it’s pants-on-head bananas. Trading and therefore price action is dominated by algorithms which amplifies hype cycles. Who couldn’t see SpaceX as being overvalued?

        But that’s the problem. Many of us definitely knew SpaceX was overvalued. It should have been a no-brainer to short this stock at IPO… however, look at Tesla stock. That shit should have cratered years ago but still hasn’t. I wanted to short this stock, but I didn’t trust the Musk morons to not continue humping his sack. Even when you can see that something is pants-on-head bananas, there are enough idiots out there (and enough insider traders) making shit irrational.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 小时前

      Movies like the Big Short, Margin Call, shows like Billions, or whatever the inheritance show was, make people think they can be the ones smarter.

      However, most individual investors aren’t usually of the arrogance that they’ll do better than the billionaires and hedge funds just of the arrogance they can still get more scraps than others and won’t get eaten themselves.

      • wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 小时前

        There’s also the individual investors who care about the morality of their investments more than the profits. Not putting money into Nazi owned companies for example. Fuck anyone with a single cent in spacex or Tesla or anything with musk’s disgusting fingerprints on it.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 小时前

          I think this is a much more attainable goal. You’re not trying to do better in a numeric sense but in a moral sense.