cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49853131

Feels to me like GrapheneOS did exactly what it should, passing the US border test with flying colours!

Funny part about this lawsuit: “With a little planning ahead of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where you’re going,”

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    GrapheneOS - the only OS that i just installed and forget about it. Sure i spend time to tweak things like profiles but thats it.

    And I am a distro and rom hopper.

    The security model is that good: duress pin, scrambled pin, separate profiles with their own passwords, usb c restriction (you can set it charge only, charge while phone is off (most secure state).

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      and yet people even here don’t understand why it would be useful even without the hardware security thinhs of the pixel

      • BigTwerp@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        You can only install Graphene on a Google phone and there’s two big issues with that:

        1. you are rewarding Google by buying their hardware.
        2. it doesn’t matter how secure the os claims to be if the hardware is compromised and there is nothing you can do to convince me that a pixel doesn’t have a backdoor into your data at a hardware level. If I was a conspiracy minded type I might say that Graphene is a Trojan Horse.