• eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Maybe, but »excessive investment« and »failed technology« aren’t the same thing: Railroads, fiber optics and the dot com era all burned absurd amounts of capital, yet the infrastructure outlived the investors. AI could follow the same pattern: terrible returns for today’s shareholders, enormous value for tomorrow’s economy.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, but the AI infrastructure is made out of compute hardware that’s going to need replaced in 6 years. Not rails that will still be useable in 50 years.

      We aren’t building lasting infrastructure other than the actual buildings.

      • eicker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’d argue the models and software are the real long term assets. GPUs depreciate like any other hardware, but a better training pipeline, inference stack, proprietary data, and a model with millions of paying users can survive multiple hardware generations. The chips are replaceable. The ecosystem and customer relationships are much harder to replicate.

        • melfie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, there’s a lot of innovation going on to run powerful models on modest hardware and the state of the art for running local models is changing all the time. If the trend continues, models hosted in a data center will only be for niche use cases.