Nature creates round objects all the time (stones in a river, a hedgehog in a ball,…), but the principle of an axle is not found as far as I know.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    it’s gears, alright, but i don’t think that it can rotate by more than 360°?

    • alpine_jim@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, that’s what I meant by not an axle.

      But, come to think of it, we can swing our arms round and round, more than 360°.

      • Kevin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I would argue that’s more due to the up-down and front-back limited rotations combining to form a circular mode, kinda like a Cartesian to Polar coordinate mapping

        • alpine_jim@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          that’s reasonable.

          bonus fun fact - the etymology is connected - “axle” comes from older words for “shoulder”, or “armpit”, which survives in some regional Englishes as “oxter” - the connection is apparently that you’d carry a person by putting their arms up and linking at the shoulders, much like an axle is how wheels carry a cart.

          https://www.etymonline.com/word/axle