The GNU Compiler Collection will reject copyright-significant contributions derived from LLM output, with limited exceptions for trivial changes and test cases.
Yeah, LLM code is fundamentally incompatible with FOSS licensing because you fundamentally cannot vet the codebases that it was trained from.
Doesn’t really have anything to do with what it’s trained on. The fact is, that you cannot copyright code written by an LLM, and copyright is required for copyleft licenses to be enforceable.
Doesn’t really have anything to do with what it’s trained on. The fact is, that you cannot copyright code written by an LLM, and copyright is required for copyleft licenses to be enforceable.