Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 5 days agoThe GNU Compiler Collection will reject copyright-significant contributions derived from LLM output, with limited exceptions for trivial changes and test cases.linuxiac.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down12 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1131arrow-down1external-linkThe GNU Compiler Collection will reject copyright-significant contributions derived from LLM output, with limited exceptions for trivial changes and test cases.linuxiac.comPierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 5 days agomessage-square22fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareell1e@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 days agoIt seems like they do though, because it’s explicitly allowed Code or other content generated in whole or in part using AI tools can be contributed to Linux Foundation projects. and beyond that, some numbers suggest it’s highly likely that it’s happening with no public concern or pushback from the kernel leadership. I’ve also brought up these concerns on the mailing list, with apparently no response from the maintainers, even though Linus was CC’ed here by another kernel dev. Specifically, my suggestion to not allow AI code submissions resulted in no response. I’m not saying I would be owed a response. But the implications of that seem pretty clear.
It seems like they do though, because
it’s explicitly allowed
and beyond that,
some numbers suggest it’s highly likely that it’s happening with no public concern or pushback from the kernel leadership.
I’ve also brought up these concerns on the mailing list, with apparently no response from the maintainers, even though Linus was CC’ed here by another kernel dev. Specifically, my suggestion to not allow AI code submissions resulted in no response.
I’m not saying I would be owed a response. But the implications of that seem pretty clear.