• fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    People act like these series of events have pushed humanity forward. We are seeing the US, EU, and China all try to do as well as they were during the era of freer trade. Unfortunately for both China and the US the primary reasons for them pushing for this less then world is mostly desire to have their respective state dominate more people’s then they can now.

    • inari@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      I think for China the drive is more in the sense of trying to escape poverty by industrializing, and securing their supply chains to avoid another century of humiliation.

  • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Some of it translated

    If China manages to produce the DUV machines itself, it could cost ASML billions of euros in the long run. In the last quarter, 14 % of the machines ASML sold went to China. The Veldhoven‑based manufacturer expects to earn 20 % of its revenue from China this year. If the revenue forecast, recently revised up from €43 billion to €45 billion for this year, materialises, that would correspond to roughly €9 billion.

    Further testing

    For now ASML does not seem to have to worry. Chinese technology is not yet as advanced and reliable as that of the Dutch company. Before mass production can start in China, the machines still need to be tested. This year China is reportedly starting production of five machines; a year later that number is expected to rise to twenty.

    Although ASML appears to retain its lead for the moment, investors were spooked on Monday. The ASML share ended 8.5 % lower, the lowest level since early June. Dutch rivals Besi and ASM also fell sharply, losing almost 10 % and more than 7 % of their value respectively.

  • heh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At this point I’ve accepted that the USA has ceded(purposefully?) its top spot on the world stage to China.

  • stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    What most people don’t understand is that the more you push China with tariffs, restrictions and sanctions, the more they will become self reliant - especially when it comes to technology. They will not roll over and curl up. Quite the opposite. Such a smart move by Trump’s vasal Mark Rutte to block a commercial company selling to China. Just like with Nexperia. Both backfired hard as China has doubled its efforts to catch up and in case of Nexperia just manufactured these chips locally.

    China already has equivalent GPU’s just not as efficient yet. https://tech-insider.org/huawei-ascend-950pr-ai-chip-nvidia-china-2026/

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s ridiculous to do that so late in the game, but companies really wanted to outsource production to cheap areas in the 80s and ignore the long term consequences.

    • Frettchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What most people don’t understand is that they don’t play by the rules and should not play with us at all.

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Markets do have rules, though; rules are essentially all they are. If you play by a different set of rules than me, depending on what they are, it could result in one of us always winning every interaction because of the way the rules fail to line up.

          In those scenarios, we have to be OK with that, agree to the same rules, or decide independently or together to play separately. Instead, we’re choosing option #1 and bitching incessantly about the unfairness. We can try the other options, but elites, at least until very recently, have been content to sell the future for more in the present. Now that it is “the future”, its biting them too and they suddenly see the issue.

      • stumu415@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Like everyone should play by the fucked up rules set by the US? It good that at least one major world power doesn’t give a shit about America anymore. The US is forcing all countries to do the same. Europe is trying to break free of the US shackles, China just was first.

        If you see how little ceremony there was for President Pedo compared to let’s say the President of Uganda who visited recently - BTW China knows the correct name of each country in Africa unlike the clown show that is the US - you know how little respect they have.

        https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/us-government-map-africa-mislabels-every-country-global-conference-2026-07-30/

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    ASML is a victim of US sanctions and Dutch/EU spinelessness. China would never had bothered to pursue lithography as serious as it did if US wasn’t continuously trying to stop China on every technological front. The Europeans let US do it in the hope and under the promise that China would never succeed.

    • AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think China would have pursued it regardless, they just might have relied more heavily on European tech then they do now and thus would have delayed their home grown tech. Or if Europe played their cards right would have resulted in a better trade alliance with China and have benefitted both economic areas by exchanging tech advances sidelining the US. This last one might be a bit to much of a utopia though

      • Korkki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        it’s really inefficient to pursue such a massive research endeavor if ASML was just normally open for business. To do all that work was only justified by it opening a chance in domestic semiconductor production which is the real price for China. Now they are probably also wanting to compete in DUV machines in the future, to recoup the development costs, even if the real price is the self-sufficiency that they bring.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Due to Western export restrictions, ASML is only allowed to export some of these machines to China; the most modern equipment is subject to a complete blockade.

    In the past quarter, 14 percent of the machines that ASML sold went to China.

    Play stupid games and win stupid prizes.

    Preventing one of your biggest customers (China) from getting the equipment they need forces them to make it themselves.
    Now China can make their own DUV lithography machines of similar quality to the ones they can get from ASML.
    And obviously it won’t stop there, China will continue to improve, and probably in a few years compete with ASML on the high end EUV equipment too.

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Politicians, and even corporate C-suite, often confuse “cheaper to buy from the incumbent” with “incumbent has impossible-to-replicate technology,” completely ignoring that it’s way easier to invent something the second time.

      Technology might have been a barrier in 1960’s China, but they’re a peer nation today.

    • inari@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That and the NVIDIA ban on China both backfired spectacularly

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Absolutely, although China can’t match Nvidia yet, they can now make chips that are good enough for 90% of the tasks.
        Nvidia can no longer sell their second rate products developed specially for China anymore either.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Worth mentioning that this export restriction was only enforced because of continuous pressure from the US.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Of course if China manages to spin major fab capacity of bleeding edge nodes off of this in the next few years they’ll have no use for US chips.

    Couple that with the fabs being built in the US currently and Taiwan is losing a lot of strategic leverage…

  • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If the sheer incompetence would stay consistent, US companies would start to buy chinese vcards and maybe even their inventory of underpowered nvidias. The American way is to play bait and switch without even baiting. It is to poke own eyes out to win at poker.