Deykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-29 months agoAcademic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageAcademic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialDeykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-29 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarebedrooms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoNo, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.
No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.