• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 年前

        There’s even less privacy if I have to have the WhatsApp app installed on my phone to send that message.

      • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 年前

        You have the big plus of not having the WhatsApp app installed and snooping around with all those permissions it has.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Would it not be E2EE? Isn’t that one of the reasons for using the Signal protocol?

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 年前

          Yes, the “delivering” part would be E2EE. Do we really know the afterwards if they can read their users’ messages? They probably can.

          • falsemirror@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 年前

            Whatsapp CANNOT read messages when e2ee is enabled, this client-side snooping was discussed when the protocol was first implemented. Whatsapp collects a ton of metadata and social graph info, but not message content.

          • n2burns@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 年前

            Sure, but any messaging app (including Signal) could have these backdoors in place. Heck, there’s even vectors for unrelated apps on your phone to read this data once unencrypted.

        • authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          if i remember correctly, it would be E2EE (WhatsApp and Messenger are too) but Meta stores the encrypted message on their server

      • ViciousTurducken@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Them being nonprofit has nothing to do with the pursuit of marketshare. Plenty of nonprofits want to maximize marketshare. Them being nonprofit means they are mission-driven.

        And what is that mission?

        Per the Signal Foundation’s website:

        Protect free expression and enable secure global communication through open source privacy technology.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 年前

          Them being nonprofit has nothing to do with the pursuit of marketshare.

          Um, of course it does? LOL

          Them being nonprofit means they are mission-driven.

          And what is that mission?

          Let’s talk about what the opposite of their mission is: Mainly operating as a source of data collection and revenue for a corporate surveillance and advertising agency.

          Do they want more users? Sure. Are they going to compromise on their core principles out of convenience for their users? Abso-fuckin-lutely not.