TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoTrickflationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square225fedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down123
arrow-up1991arrow-down1imageTrickflationlemmy.worldTokenBoomer@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square225fedilink
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down6·8 months agoThat can’t be true. Consider a cylinder cut in half, giving a circular cross section. Cover each new circular gap with new aluminum. Now you’ve enclosed the same volume in cylinders, with a different surface area.
minus-squaregamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·8 months agoYou also created 2 cylinders where once there was one, which is not what was being discussed. You even mention that you added material: Cover each new circular gap with new aluminum I could have said “2 cylinders of the same volume” but I felt context made that clear
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·8 months agoYes I did say that I added material. That’s the point: you cannot do this transformation without adding material. But you’re saying this is only with two cylinders?
That can’t be true.
Consider a cylinder cut in half, giving a circular cross section. Cover each new circular gap with new aluminum.
Now you’ve enclosed the same volume in cylinders, with a different surface area.
You also created 2 cylinders where once there was one, which is not what was being discussed. You even mention that you added material:
I could have said “2 cylinders of the same volume” but I felt context made that clear
Yes I did say that I added material. That’s the point: you cannot do this transformation without adding material.
But you’re saying this is only with two cylinders?