• henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t forget when the update stage actually reads 100%, which makes no logical sense because if the stage was at 100%, you wouldn’t still be telling me we are processing it as the current stage.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Somehow Windows struggles with file i/o and always has been. When copying stuff to floppy disks in Win 3 or 95 the progress bar steadily grew to 100% and since floppies were loud, you could hear that the actual copying only started then and you had to wait longer staring at 100% than the progress bar before.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          You just gave me a nostalgia bomb of copying files on Win98/XP and watching the little files fly from one folder to the other for 5 minutes after the progress bar filled up.

          I miss little animations like that, makes me wish there were more fun little things in OS UIs these days. Now everything is just a bar and a number.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      meanwhile updates on linux telling me exactly what is happening in real time, working completely in the background, and politely informing me that i may wish to reboot to apply all the updates properly

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Linux updates are much superior, but Windows updates have not taken more than 5 minutes for me for a long time.

          I just hate all the reboots. Linux can update everything, even kernels now, and no downtime. Reminds me of crap home internet routers: “oh you changed the date&time? Then I gotta reboot”