GregorTacTac@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agoDoes anyone know how to crack Mladinska Knjiga audiobook DRM?emka.siexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkDoes anyone know how to crack Mladinska Knjiga audiobook DRM?emka.siGregorTacTac@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tubelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoWhile it would defeat most if not all audio DRM, this would result in a lossy capture, whether by line-in or Bluetooth.
minus-squarebitfucker@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI am well aware, but it is bullet proof as in they couldn’t restrict the OS from outputting audio somewhere else. For lossless DRM breaking, I’ll leave that to the more technically skilled person. I am more of a developer than a “hacker”
minus-squareBizarroland@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoJack is minimally lossy. It would change the audio just from the DAC operation and the noise floor but otherwise be pretty good.
While it would defeat most if not all audio DRM, this would result in a lossy capture, whether by line-in or Bluetooth.
I am well aware, but it is bullet proof as in they couldn’t restrict the OS from outputting audio somewhere else. For lossless DRM breaking, I’ll leave that to the more technically skilled person. I am more of a developer than a “hacker”
Jack is minimally lossy. It would change the audio just from the DAC operation and the noise floor but otherwise be pretty good.