I think —DOCKER— is doing this. I installed based, and userspace(7)-pilled liblxc and libvirt and then this asshole inserted a dependency when I tried to install from their Debian package with sudo dpkg -i. One of them was qemu-system, the other was docker-cli because they were forcing me to use Docker-Desktop, which I would not be caught dead using.
So is this accidental, or another predatory move by one of these ‘ooh I wish I did not open source’ companies (e.g. HashiCorp)? Why don’t we all use LXC and ditch this piece of shit?
I could be misunderstanding how Debian-based packaging works. But this is too ‘’‘accidental’‘’. Correct me if I am wrong.
uname -a for context:
Linux pop-os 6.8.0-76060800daily20240311-generic #202403110203~1714077665~22.04~4c8e9a0 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu A x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I posted my
history
as a response to @Technus. I know about --no-install-recommends but that’s anapt(1)
switch. How can I do that withdpkg(1)
? Check my history, I’ve been building more than I have been installing lately. Like, for a long time I have been looking for a ‘useful’ language to make, and then I remembered that there’s a swath of programmers in my country who are addicted to Delphi, and Nkki W. has not pushed to Pascal upstream since 1974. So I decided to host a Pascal on JVM. I made ANTLR. But then, it kept complaining that some targets fail, so I had to remove them from pom.xml. I myself am new to Java toolchain tbqh. I think one language that most people build from source is NodeJS. NodejS toolchain is not as good as say, Ruby’s or Guile’s, but it’s good enough and easy to use.Thanks.
You can install .deb files with apt by prepending a
./
, e.g.sudo apt install --no-install-recommends ./docker-desktop-4.30.0-amd64.deb
would work. I usually avoid using dpkg unless I have to.Also:
insapp
an alias or something?sudo apt-get install -f
before, was your install already broken?1- Not sure, I can’t read; 2- Yes, Fish; 3- Yes, it fixed it.