• Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The glide ratio of a Cessna 172 is about 9:1, video is from a T210N Centurion II, a similarly sized but heavier plane, so its gliding capabilities are worse.

    The glide ratio of an Airbus A320 is 17:1.

    A huge Airbus is much better at gliding than a small Cessna.

      • scarilog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        This is the craziest Wikipedia article I’ve read in a while.

        Feel sad for the dudes mental health state, but damn, what a way to go. A well executed barrel roll in a q400, seemingly without prior flight experience. Wild.

      • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Still reading the article, but I felt compled to comment on the level of detail:

        Both [fighter jets] […] reached supersonic speeds, which generated sonic booms on the way to the Puget Sound area. [emphasis added]

        Are these sonic booms relevant to the actual incident? Probably not. But the author decided it was part of the events and decided to include it and I find that endearing.

          • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago
            1. agreed
            2. That may well be the reason they were noted in the first place, but the article makes no further mention of them if they were relevant, so it’s still an editorial choice whether to include that detail. There is no informational value to it, it doesn’t affect the rest of the article, just a minor note “fast plane make boom” because it’s cool.