The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 6 months agoIt's so overlemmy.worldimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageIt's so overlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 6 months agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 months agoNow it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoAlso the “select the image below containing the example image above.” Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 months agoSo that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
minus-squarebitwolf@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoA common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize. It could be a precursor for that step.
Now it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
Also the “select the image below containing the example image above.”
Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
So that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
A common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize.
It could be a precursor for that step.