• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    lack of local accounting means its no longer your operating system, youre now using a perpetually required service from microsoft.

    the walled garden is putting the last bricks in place. hope all you windows fans are …happy… asking apple microsoft for permission to use your own hardware.

      • Onihikage@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I switched to Bazzite not long after the Recall AI announcement, shrinking my Windows partition to leave it for just VR stuff which currently doesn’t work well outside of Windows, at least on my system. It’s pretty great! Not perfect, but the problems I have on Bazzite are similar enough in quantity and degree to problems I had on Windows that I’ve basically switched out one set of weird OS quirks for another. The big difference is now I don’t have to think about the OS being disrespectful corporate spyware.

          • Onihikage@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not that I know of; Bazzite is completely based on Fedora Atomic Desktops, which are an immutable type of distro that makes the core OS a read-only image that all gets updated separately from system apps. The Ubuntu equivalent of Fedora Atomic Desktops is Ubuntu Core, but I don’t know if Bazzite has a Ubuntu Core-based equivalent. Bazzite is released by a group called Universal Blue, which makes prepackaged OS builds based on Fedora Atomic Desktops, with particular focus areas. Bazzite focuses on including all gaming-related tweaks, apps, configs, and optimizations out of the box, Aurora focuses on general desktop PC functionality, and Bluefin focuses on productivity, but in the end they’re all Atomic/Immutable distros based on Fedora. It’s worth poking through it all and picking one that best suits your needs.

            • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              What parts of the immutable OS are read only? Like filesystem wise? I’m not sure I really get it.

              • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The basic of immutable desktops is that every system file (what’s outside your home directory (folder) ) is readonly, you can install apps through the app store.

                But I’d say Linux mint (a Non-immutable) distro is what you should try first, because it’s more user-friendly and easier to get help for.

                • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Oh I’ve been using Linux for over 20 years. That’s not an issue.

                  I have a better idea now of what an immutable distro is thanks to your explanation. I don’t know if that’s what I would want after all.

                  I think I prefer the freedom of being able to modify my system files and configs as I need to customize my system as I see fit, even if it meansb potentially breaking something.

      • exscape@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can still block it easily with the command prompt (Shift+F10 during the install) as mentioned. But don’t let that stop you from switching to Linux if you feel like it.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      hope all you windows fans are …happy… asking apple microsoft for permission to use your own hardware.

      It’s been this way for decades, really. Apple, Google, MS, etc. Even if they let you use it without an account, they’ll literally never stop pressuring you and annoying you into signing into an account.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Apple doesn’t actually make it at all difficult to use a Mac or iOS device without an Apple account. You’re asked once during setup and that’s it. At most there’ll be a red dot in Settings>iCloud.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They do, actually. There’s a bunch of first party software you can’t remove, perpetual notifications you can’t clear about setting up iCloud, etc.

          • psvrh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s one notice, and it’s in the System Settings app. And it’s a little red dot beside the iCloud section. That’s not really the same league as what Microsoft is doing, or Even Google’s nag to use Chrome across all their Web properties.

            You’re right about the first-party apps that you can’t remove, but it’s also not the same as, eg, Edge where those apps are used constantly and your preferences are reset on every update.

            On my Mac I set my browser to Firefox in 2018. It’s never reverted to Safari, not once, where Windows really wants me to use Edge and goes so far as to not just reset it periodically, but also direct start menu searches and in-app web links to an ms-edge: url instead of using the http handler.

            Apple has problems, but this isn’t one of them.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              That’s not really the same league as what Microsoft is doing

              I didn’t say it was. It is intentionally and perpetually annoying, nonetheless.

        • Auzy@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can’t use a lot of apps without it

          So sure you can, but it isn’t an awesome experience

      • tektite@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        But apparently you DO need an Apple ID to access an Apple Notes file that was shared to your Android by your crazy ex who doesn’t know that without an iPhone you won’t be able to read their undoubtedly unhinged, rambling guilt trip. Thanks Apple!

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure it could, but I think Apple makes so much on overcharging for the machine itself they don’t need to be so aggressive over data collection just logically.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sadly I think they have to aim to do both, to make the most money as a publically traded company.

            Last I heard Apple was protecting it’s users from Facebook collecting their data… by being the ones who collect it instead. Maybe that not quite right as I don’t listen to news on Apple (outside of their opposition to right to repair).

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      We would have that freedom with Android too if those stupid banking apps stopped trying to dictate what you can run on your hardware & Google giving them more features to do so.