sir_pronoun@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Study finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1542arrow-down165file-text
arrow-up1477arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comsir_pronoun@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square141fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareneclimdul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 年前No it’s a set of tools you can use to run a project. My point is that a lot of people use “agile” to mean not planning or don’t put guard rails on scope and they fail. That’s not agile, it’s just bad PM
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Agreed. Being Agile is being flexible. To do that you need to plan for multiple contingencies. Resulting in more planning, not none.
minus-squarejj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前“agile” is being flexible. Being “Agile” more often than not means your company’s incompetent management paid some hack consultants to come in and bless your flavor of stupid bureaucracy as “Agile”.
No it’s a set of tools you can use to run a project.
My point is that a lot of people use “agile” to mean not planning or don’t put guard rails on scope and they fail. That’s not agile, it’s just bad PM
Agreed.
Being Agile is being flexible. To do that you need to plan for multiple contingencies. Resulting in more planning, not none.
“agile” is being flexible. Being “Agile” more often than not means your company’s incompetent management paid some hack consultants to come in and bless your flavor of stupid bureaucracy as “Agile”.