• NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well, since the billionaire class doesn’t pay it’s fair share of the tax burden, that money has to come from somewhere.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a popular thought, but even if we take 100% from the billionaires it pays for almost one year for the US.

      • RogueAozame@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        While I understand what assumption you’re running under no one said for only billionaires to pay. The idea is progressive tax brackets the less you make the less you pay percentage wise. We also need less loopholes for the people that can buy lawyers and manipulate their funds to get out of paying what they should. There is no reason companies and the extremely wealthy should be paying an effectively less tax percentage than the diminishing lower middle class.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not about only billionaires paying, it’s about them not being a magical money source. A higher rate might feel better, but it’s not solving government revenue problems.

          • RogueAozame@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It will not suddenly balance the budget but it is funding that will either reduce the deficit, or reduce the burden on poorer people. We can’t fix decades of poor decisions with one good decision, it’s simply a good decision we can make now that will help.