Type 1 [Missouri]@midwest.socialM to United States | News & Politics@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agoUS Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private actswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up198arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private actswww.reuters.comType 1 [Missouri]@midwest.socialM to United States | News & Politics@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRanvier@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoThe ruling on presidential immunity today was pretty paradoxical, he has criminal immunity to breaking the law if he argues it’s “to take care that laws be faithfully executed.” Absolute immunity even since that’s right in article 2, so why not?
The ruling on presidential immunity today was pretty paradoxical, he has criminal immunity to breaking the law if he argues it’s “to take care that laws be faithfully executed.” Absolute immunity even since that’s right in article 2, so why not?