even though checkinstall is buggy and old, when it works it’s great.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s because the program developers didn’t bother to put in an uninstall script

    But also who installs tarballs anymore except f u c k i n g n e r d s

  • iopq@latte.isnot.coffee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Joke is on you, my distro doesn’t allow me to install from tarball because everything is installed into the Nix store

      • iopq@latte.isnot.coffee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t let you do that, Dave - NixOS, probably

        lots of folders on the system are read-only and get changed when you run rebuild

      • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, a new file would likely be created, but it would still do its job upon make uninstall. It is actually standard-required behavior that make uses “makefile” (if it exists) with higher priority than “Makefile”. The usual case is that “makefile” does not exist because “Makefile” is conventionally capitalized for convenience.

        • Andrew@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dammit, sneaky fox will actually be able to do damage with that command… TIL, thanks.

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        even package managers will still put stuff in random places like binaries outside my $PATH… or not even clearly telling me what the binary is named or how to execute what I just installed.