• downpunxx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    yeah, no kidding, a real bitch if you want to back up your systems, and the hit to processing speed is significant, though with it enabled, the days of popping out a hard drive, and grabbing whatever the hell’s on there with a usb connection are over

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      AES-NI has been standard for over a decade. There shouldn’t be a significant hit to processing speed.

      • downpunxx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        and i work with dozens of disparate windows systems on multiple hardware platforms on the regular, the speed degradation with bitlocker encryption still exists, and is noticeable

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’ve benchmarked this? Using what encryption algorithm, what processors, what benchmark?

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            More to the point, I think, is are there even any systems that will run Windows 11 that don’t have AES-NI?

            Performance without it is kinda irrelevant because there’s no situation where you’d have Windows 11 and bitlocker and NOT AES-NI.

    • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      the days of popping out a hard drive, and grabbing whatever the hell’s on there with a usb connection are over

      Independent repair shops are going to suffer big time from this.

      • downpunxx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        well, if the customer provides them the bitlocker key, then they can access and manipulate the data on the drive, if not, they’re fucked

        • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve supported bitlocker in corporate deployments. I have also spent some time in independent repair shops. I have little confidence in users to supply a bitlocker key, let alone even know what one is. I anticipate a lot of “what? I already gave you my password.”

      • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Obviously, Microsoft will happily sell you one drive cloud backup to solve the problem they are creating.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can still mount it to another machine if you have the key. It’s an extra layer of pain in the ass, though.

      I don’t use an M$ account so if your key is backed up to the cloud (aside: can’t wait to read the headline about when that gets breached) I don’t personally know offhand how difficult it is to extricate your BitLocker keys from Microsoft.