Here’s one example of this system in use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_name

Edit - I realize I probably misunderstood the question. But as said in another comment, it’s just a swap if we’re not talking about patronymic/matronymic naming systems.

-200%

A lake of pigshit

Benedict

They’ll be in the public domain for infinity years, which is more than creator lifetime + xxx years. Works wanting copyright protection must be forced to submit copies to a permanent archive.

Ah! Well, apologies.

Nokia sealed their fate when they spent $8bn on NavTeq. Switching to Android would have made the purchase valueless, and the people responsible for the acquisition were still in charge.

Uh, it’s been coined for decades now.

I guess Reuters installed countermeasures for archive.today. thanks!

Edit: The below is not correct, looks like Reuters has an anti-bypass in place for the archive.

The article is one sentence which doesn’t add anything to the headline, in case the paywall tempted you.

https://archive.is/20240425133704/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-york-top-court-overturns-former-hollywood-producer-weinsteins-conviction-2024-04-25/

Ha ha Darién Gap

I’ll see how the $50 AliExpress knock-off version works in a year or two

Happened to me in 1997 but I didn’t mind

Probably best to avoid systems with known deniable encryption methods, and keep your dummy data there. Then hide your secrets e.g. in deleted space on a drive, in the cloud, or a well-hidden micro-sd card. All have risks, maybe it’s best of all to not keep your secrets with you, and make sure they can’t be associated with you.

As referred in other comment, the counter counter is to just keep beating to get further keys/hidden data.

There are some cases involving plausible deniability where game theory tells you should beat the person until dead even if they give up their keys, since there might be more.

deleted by creator

Modest proposal, disenfranchise all normies. Utopia awaits.

It’s getting dark

The only theft going on is the ongoing theft from the public domain, due to corruption of copyright law by special interests enabled by law for hire. Your analogy is irrelevant as the marginal cost of operating a park for an extra visitor is not zero.