I advocate for logical and consistent viewpoints on controversial topics. If you’re looking at my profile, I’ve probably made you mad by doing so.

  • 0 Posts
  • 83 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle














  • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldadhd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That’s fair, but comics like the above (which are endemic to this sub) aren’t about the extremes and are about standard human behaviours.

    It’d be like someone seeing me double check the door lock at my house and saying “You must have OCD.”

    I also find it mildly concerning that someone may see these memes / comics and self-diagnose themselves with a mental illness that they do not have since self-diagnosis (and wanting to belong to a group) is a massive issue in the internet age.






  • The part that doesn’t make sense is how a guess on a QC in a binary is any better than a scientist just guessing an outcome from a binary. Yeah, it can do it a lot, but if you can’t test the outcome to verify if it’s correct or not, how is it better than any other way of guessing outcomes?

    Statistically, it absolutely isn’t. Even if it continually narrows things down via guesses, it’s still no more valuable than any other guesses. Because in all the whitepapers I’ve seen, it’s not calculating anything because it can’t. It’s simply assuming that one option is correct.

    In the real world, it’s not a calculation and it doesn’t assist in… anything really. It’s no better than a random number generator assigning those numbers to a result. I don’t get the utility other than potentially breaking numerical cryptography.