Gotta remember to come back in 8 hours lol. This might be a fun experiment, since basically every corporate social media wants to be tiktok already.

The United States is not Ukraine’s only ally, but it is the only one with the willingness and means to supply Ukraine’s war effort. Many European nations lack a political tradition of arming other countries. They have sent Ukraine some impressive weapons, like German tanks and Swedish shoulder-fired missiles. But “they cannot pump out munitions,” Julian said. “They cannot produce large numbers of artillery shell rounds — the No. 1 thing Ukraine needs.”

This whole paragraph is truly a piece of Yankee writing.

I agree, but it somehow took me by surprise a CIA (or ex-CIA) person would use their own personal Twitter account to engage in twitter fights.

You’d think the intelligence guy would be a bit more savvy about how to use social media pseudonymously.

Movie AI apocalypse: Skynet takes over every computer on the internet and nukes all urban centres

Real “AI” apocalypse: clueless general asks a probabilistic chatbot what to do every day, accidentally starts war

I think Parthia counts as one of the biggest competitors during the rise period, but during the decline period they were already the replaced by the Sassanids (I’m not acquainted the internal details of how that happened).

But like Axum, neither were ever in a position where they could capitalise on the failing Roman grasp in the Northwestern Mediterranean (nowadays called “Europe”). So the pressure they applied was in the frontiers rather than the direct blows to the core of the Western Half by the Visigoths and Vandals and such.

Geography severely restricted them in a way that can’t restrict China from forming economic alliance with the USA’s plundering grounds, so that was the gist of what I was referring to.

But after the fall of the West, the Sassanid empire became the biggest imperial rival for Rome until the Muslim expansion made them look like rump states. So in a very contrived way, one could say Iran was always (Imperial) Rome’s biggest opponent, but sadly there was no Iran in Britain.

Makes sense. I didn’t quite understand what you were referring to, so the reply was a bit kneejerk. I wonder if there’ll ever be a “low pay” situation for the MIC, though. It seems to be the only thing the US ever bothers to fund.

Your point regarding BRICS makes a lot of sense too. I don’t think Rome ever had any equal competitor after Carthage like China is to the USA. Most comparable empires were too far away to “steal” Roman support. Best I can think is Axum or the Sassanid Empire, but they’re too far from the Mediterranean. Imagine the impact of something like BRI but for western Latin America.

I still think it’s risky to compress the Roman timeline when it comes for ideological and policy decisions, moreso due to how it simplifies a lot of the nuance and ebb and flow of history. It’s so much time, with so much happening and so much surviving history, that it’s easy to cherrypick specific events to create one specific narrative.

So for example, much as I agree that not being able to maintain their professional non-citizen army created the conditions for (at least) regime at multiple points in Roman history, I also think that promising citizenship for alliances during the Social War was critical for Roman victory against the rebelling tribes, and drove a wedge between them.

And it may be my Byzantophile heart speaking for me, but given the East remained fairly strong up until the 7th century (and almost retook Italy under Justinian I in the 6th), I’d say that was actually just the new core for the Empire rather than “parts of” Rome.

I remember reading something about how the Roman economy was already being redirected from Italy and Iberia to North Africa and Anatolia, but I can’t confirm it with a source right now. But a good proxy is how many post-Hadrian senators and Emperors wrote in Greek rather than Latin.

Overall though, I agree with your points and am just being pedantic.

At what point are you referring here? Rome had struggle sessions about citizenship for military service since even before the Empire, with a notable example being the Social War, which ended with the extension of citizenship to allied tribes.

Non-citizen armies were already a thing since the early Julio-Claudian period. And doling out citizenship for “good service” was a practice as long as citizenship itself in Rome.

One could hardly call that a “main factor” to the fall if it was so present during Rome’s rise in the first place, unless they severely compress the timeline. In fact it’s a common technique by modern racists to try and equate Roman non-citizens and “barbarians” with modern USA immigrants, and pin the whole fall of (Western) Rome on trying to incorporate those “migrants”.

It’s worth remembering that the entirety of Rome’s “Fall” historiographical section is usually some 250 years in length, about the same as the entire history of the USA.

And even after the dissolution of the Western Half by the Odoasser coup, Eastern Rome still kept trudging along for almost a thousand years And for most of that time they employed foreign mercenaries and soldiers, either from unincorporated regions of Anatolia, or later on from the region that eventually became the Kievan Rus’, who were given privileges. Two notable examples are the Isaurian-born emperor Zeno and the Varangian Guard.

Maybe I’m a bit over-serious when it comes to Rome, but I think it’s important to not be fall into anachronism to criticise the current Empire.

This current development could be taken as a proxy of a sign of desperation to get new recruits. It could also be an useful tool to groom loyal “good migrant” future citizens, to create more splits in migrant communities and prevent class consciousness. I would argue it worked out very well for the Roman regime in many parts of their history.

The other, called Wagemole, sees threat actors pretend to be jobseekers as part of a ruse aimed at both financial gain and espionage.

That’s just called an “internship”.

It’s been so bad that life expectancy has been dropping since 2019, linked heavily with suicide and opioid addiction.

Best part is the only Democrat primary candidate to even mention it was Mathman Enlightened Centrist Andrew Yang of all people. Tens of thousands of people kill themselves each year, and all they get is a suicide hotline and an “I voted” sticker to “defeat Donald Trump”.

surprising reasons

It’s the material conditions of working class Statesians again. How surprising.

I hate how suicide is treated as some mysterious issue by the bourgeois media. How hard is it to think that maybe making life easier and worth living would make more people want to stay alive?

Every time a liberal politician says “we have to be practical” about implementing basic social welfare such as higher minimum wage or universal healthcare, remember that they are explicitly weighing the amount of people who will die or kill themselves without those things.

As one author puts it:

“Suicide hotline crisis numbers and efforts to help people at the individual level are all amazing and necessary, but our work shows that higher-level, institutional interventions are also critical in addressing this crisis,” said Simon. “Giving a person a job or proper health care can also be a suicide-prevention tool.”

If anybody has access to the paper, could you upload it somewhere and give me a ping? I really want to read it, but it’s not in the sci-hub yet.

Managed to get access, here’s the paper in catbox.

Putin and Xi browsing Reddit after that one.

Over the past two years, more than 250,000 migrant children have come alone to the United States. Thousands of children have ended up in punishing jobs across the country — working overnight in slaughterhouses, replacing roofs, operating machinery in factories — all in violation of child labor laws, a recent Times investigation showed. After the article’s publication in February, the White House announced policy changes and a crackdown on companies that hire children.

It’s already happening.

Literally trying to insult an Asian person by comparing them to a yellow cartoon bear is not really a good look, specially given all the homophobia you’ve also been leaking all over the place.

Given you ignored the rest of the entire comment, I assume I was right and your hate of “evil governments” only applies to foreign ones. Typical gringo.

But please, your time is way better spent defending your homeland from foreign hordes than debating silly commies on the internet. Go get 'em soldier!

I wonder how interesting would it be to actually have a bot to keep count of typical lib shit. These people think they’re so original, I think it’d be cool to automatically keep them a bit grounded.

Damn, we need an emoji that’s just like :lib: but scratched. Who even mentioned Russia?

The sheer Statesianess of saying “I don’t care about race” within the same paragraph as referencing a racist caricature.

If you have such a problem with “governments that seek to fuck with other countries and cultures”, maybe you should educate yourself on what your homeland you so adore has done just within the 50 ten years?

It can be overwhelming, there’s so much horrifying shit. Maybe pick a small region first. I’d suggest Central America. El Salvador, Grenada and Haiti are right there. Or you can just look up Operation Condor if you’re feeling ambitious.

I’m sure your devoted love to Turtle Island will continue unshaken if you earnestly try to confront its (recent) history. That’s just sarcasm, I highly doubt you’ll ever critically evaluate your own state and state-approved ideology.

Sometimes I think you people deserve this imagined foreign-backed plots and destruction y’all keep inventing to justify your own incompetence and white supremacy. Good luck fighting your great imagined war against foreign capital, I’m sure all the homeless immigrants will be proud of your national heorism.

Because this whole thing pissed me off a lot when it was approved, have the webpage of the bill for this law. Note how it passed unanimously in the senate.

Note that it also restricts property ownership for people from Russia, Syria, Venezuela, DPR Korea and Cuba.

Note also how vague the wording is on the definition of a “foreign principal”.

It also requires those “foreign principals” that already own property to register themselves with the state government.

What always annoyed me about Democrats defending Biden is when they lean on calling it ableism or ageism. Apparently he did have a stutter when he was young, and that was used to explain some of his earlier gaffes.

Problem is, this still assumes the guy still “deserves” to be president, despite clearly being awful at it, stutter or no stutter, old or young. If the job description is basically just doing inspiring speeches and press conferences, and the guy can’t do it, it’s not ableist to want some other person.

But even worse, it ignores that Biden will never face the true horror of being disabled or old while working class. He would never had been at risk of losing his home, starving or even being arrested or institutionalised had he lost the election, because he’s rich and connected.

By using the aesthetics of fighting ableism, but ignoring the material conditions of most disabled people, liberals made a mockery of it all.

#MoreElderlyWarCriminals

A few months ago, the search engine expanded its offering by making available data from OCLC’s proprietary WorldCat database. Anna’s Archive scraped several terabytes of data over the course of a year and published roughly 700 million unique records online, for free.

Scraping data is now “hacking”. Every single computer science department will have to close its doors and surrender their research datasets to the police.

doing anything as a group is literally stalinism

I wonder why all these young people are depressed. Maybe it’s the lack of community, or their material conditions?

Nah, they just need to do legal weed. Not as a group passing a blunt while socialising, alone at home with isolated CBD drops.