Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?
Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?
Use of incendiary weapons against military targets is not a war crime unless in an area where civilians are present.
Of course they do, it’s main use is smoke generation.
Fair enough, I can see how that might be beneficial.
Ok fair enough, I see how that would be a win.
Is it really a win for LLMs if the study found no significant difference between those using it as a tutor and those not?
“One of those values being meritocracy, as much meritocracy as possible, so you get ahead as a function of your skill, and nothing else,” Musk said.
😂😂😂
Audio description.
I’m sorry, but unless you exposed any US war crimes I’m not sure I can take you seriously.
What US war crimes have you exposed?
Why waste time replying just to behave like a child?
Did you even read the links you posted?
You are definitely highly regarded.
Happily we no longer need to wonder as op confirmed this was not hyperbole.
You see sometime people say things that isn’t true for dramatic effect.
An interesting thing to post to someone who declared they were being sarcastic. You know, when I said aomething that wasn’t true for dramatic effect?
Would that really make it less mental?
I was being sarcastic; its fucking mental to brag about how easily your sister resorts to violence.
Seems like a perfectly rational response.
I fear that your understanding of karma comes from the massively bastardised western idea of it. Karma in buddhism is very far from “good things happen to good people.”
They never implied you were white, they implied you were racist.