deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I just had something like this happen when I was posting a macaroni recipe on Discord.
Folks assumed I was posting some bad stuff because Discord used recipes when they censor vile and virus-laden links, apparently.
Who knows how long people thought I was posting bad stuff; I love sharing recipes x.x
Nah, all the cool kids want Lee Carvello’s Putting Challenge
The mockingbirds are so lucky the hummingbirds don’t care, because they are shimmery little warrior badasses.
Easier to get playing, at least.
Put rectangle in rectangle.
Toggle Power.
Enjoy.
Its seriously a bigger hassle to figure out where you were in a show on Netflix if it decided not to save your spot in a show than it is to get into a level in a lot of games back in the day.
I mean more in the broad sense- to hope that there’s going to be any action at all towards something one personally likes.
My standards are pretty low I guess.
Its a vague undulation in a direction I think most folks here would probably prefer?
That’s kinda all you can realistically hope for a lot of the time
Now, I do wonder if one could use printing and a pantograph to somehow create small, but marginally viable records.
Sounds like a stupid challenge someone would make a YouTube challenge from, really
It was never implemented in PoGo, was it? Because that’s where it very clearly should have gotten a spiritual successor.
Not that I’m playing that anymore, with its predatory scheme. Orna all the way, now.
Oh, I meant IRL.
The worst was when I got treated like I was stupid for not just assuming that someone with atypical facial features had some kind of mental disability.
I mean, it was apparent that they did once I began talking to them, but like Hell am I just going to assume that based on someone’s looks.
I haven’t interacted with Christians around here.
This is the case of an article misconstruing the meaning of a scientific paper… again.
From what I gather, this is meant to mean the specific context of a gesture having the explicit, consistent purpose- that when it flutters, it means that its partner is supposed to do a specific activity with their nest.
So its not just the context sensitive “I’m letting you go first” like with a cat, or with many other creatures, its more akin to someone texting their spouse “Can you put the kettle on?”
The bizarre thing with this really is that its a visual cue, because we see this all the time with sounds, in all kinds of critters.
I honestly do try to live by WWJD. Its a pretty legit way of thinking.
But the problem is, trying to give a chance to everybody tends to earn a lot of “tsk tsk” from many Christians around here.
Part of the reason they get so high up on nerd sites (And Reddit at least started as a nerd site) is that they hunger for power, and the right people are too shy to seek power themselves.
This would all be greatly relieved if communities asked for communities to nominate other members, and asked for the type of folks who are the types who would mostly only consider the position of asked/ or if they were write-ins.
People with the capacity but are looked over because they maybe lack the ego or self confidence to take such power.
This works especially well in smaller communities under 4K users or so, which kinda falls apart in our Big Internet world, sadly…
Even before data sales, though, a baseline, universal car never happened. Was there never a market or was a market never allowed to form?
Or perhaps the tech in a car really does advance faster than I understand? But then how would retro cars be street legal?
This seems like such a wretched inevitably. I mean, I guess we’re living it with phones, but it seems so unnecessary with cars.
Is there really no market for the same boring car, with minor efficiency tweaks, for, like, ever? I coulda lived with my 95’ Accord forever if the parts hadn’t been too expensive.
Do es the market really not want that, or do the manufacturers prevent it from happening?
Any Automancer please explain, I’m not car enough to understand.
I like the interpretation that the dog is an allegorical representation for a sort of goofus bodyguard.
The point of security detail is that they just chill and stand by, right? All discrete and such, like the ancient version of the Agent 47-lookin’ dude with an earpiece who fades into the background.
But because this schmuck is loyal but a dumbass like an ancient Golden Retriever, he opens things up to try and get a better view, so he can find and subsequently protect his peeps like a Good Boi.
…In a space that historically likely could also function as a brothel.
NSFW Dudley Do-Right kinda shenanigans.
IIRC, this is the video that more or less had that interpretation in it:
https://youtu.be/9HJH6C0yp2I
I, too, was bothered by the joke for years, and this is the first explanation that has adequately satisfied me.
Technically, random race/class/etc upon a new life is really more common with Roguelites. (You kinda acknowledge that, but roll with me. Trying to be facetious with the Roguelike snobbery thing, not sure if I pulled it off lol)
Traditional Roguelikes usually let you pick what kind of fresh Hell you’re setting yourself up for.
…So maybe this is Roguelike rules.
You fuckin chose your species, religion, and class.
Just not how much food you get to eat, what books you get the chance to read (without tremendous effort on your part) and when you will die.
Oh, sweet heavens, this is so much worse! We did this to ourselves
deleted by creator