I have a version from the 80s that has a map and an appendix with all the names. I felt like that was enough for me. Whatever it takes though. My biggest recommendation to people is to just stick with it. The first part reads like the Bible or something but after that it becomes much easier.

In my experience it doesn’t matter. You have to regularly refactor your code to keep up with new features. The more often you can make time to do it the easier it is.

This hits way too close to home. Had something similar happen last week. I knew the task would be simple but didn’t realize I needed a different API key to test it locally. Lucky my boss is also a slacker like me.

And I didn’t say that none existed but here we are. Saying that it is accepted implies a majority agree though.

And because you know a handful of people who do it must be accepted by the majority?

Is it? I don’t know anyone who thinks it’s acceptable to torture an animal of any kind.

Didn’t Picasso suffer from serious depression? This sounds pretty spot on for someone who does.

People like Gabe are exactly the type that semaglutides were made for. Good for him either way.

This would mean a lot more if their livelihood wasn’t already providing them an absurdly lavish lifestyle that none of us will ever see. Let me know when AI has you on the brink of homelessness and maybe I will give a shit.

She is from Spokane Washington not Australia. She got a lot of recognition for her role in Euphoria and is blowing up a bit right now because she is a young, attractive, talented actress.

I mean, it’s posted in programming humor so yeah.

If JavaScript implements type safety then I believe it will go away. If not then it will continue to be used.

Apparently I’m not the only one since this thread was started by someone else who was confused. And should you have to be good at reading graphs to understand one? They should present the information in a clear easy to understand manner. This failed at that.

I disagree.

I more concerned about my coffee beans.

It does but if it was good it wouldn’t need an explanation.

I think that we need regulations on AI to protect citizens. Corporations are training AI off of workers/citizens data and they will use it to eliminate jobs without paying us for our contributions. Right now companies like SpaceX and Amazon want to replace workers with AI trained robots to reduce costs and that will be detrimental to the working class. I don’t believe that AI is bad. I believe corporations are evil by nature and need to be controlled.

If we allow corporations to control AI we are in for a bad time. I’m not interested in seeing these examples thanks.

That is 100% true in a capitalist society. You are measured by your ability to produce.

Edit: Apparently this needs some clarification. You are measured by your ability to produce for your owner.

I see the resemblance. I always think of this guy.