Crazy opinion. But you can simply not buy uneccesery shit for borrowed money.

Before anyone busts out the good old “but people buy necessities!!!”

Sometimes sure. But often not.

Does the luggage handler receive the money then?

Thanks for your answer. Om considering the DXP4800. I’m forced to buy one soon because my drives on the desktop are soon full.

I’m in the market for my first NAS. Synology made the choice a bit easier.

Thank you.

I have no doubt the car will crash.

But I do feel there is something strange about the car disengaging the auto pilot (cruise control) just before the crash. How can the car know it’s crashing while simultaneously not knowing it’s crashing?

I drive a model 3 myself, and there is so much bad shit about the auto pilot and rain sensors. But I have never experienced, or heard anyone else experiencing a false positive were the car disengage the auto pilot under any conditions the way shown in the video with o sound or visual cue. Considering how bad the sensors on the car is, its strange they’re state of the art every time an accident happens. There is dissonance between the claims.

Mark shouldn’t have made so many cuts in the upload. He locks the car on 39mph on the video, but crashes at 42mph. He should have kept it clean and honest.

I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn’t be trusted.

I have no doubt the car will crash.

But I do feel there is something strange about the car disengaging the auto pilot (cruise control) just before the crash. How can the car know it’s crashing while simultaneously not knowing it’s crashing?

I drive a model 3 myself, and there is so much bad shit about the auto pilot and rain sensors. But I have never experienced, or heard anyone else experiencing a false positive were the car disengage the auto pilot under any conditions the way shown in the video with o sound or visual cue. Considering how bad the sensors on the car is, its strange they’re state of the art every time an accident happens. There is dissonance between the claims.

Mark shouldn’t have made so many cuts in the upload. He locks the car on 39mph on the video, but crashes at 42mph. He should have kept it clean and honest.

I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn’t be trusted.

So Tesla owners have a monopoly on caring about the process of an experiment?

A logic conclusion by that is anyone not a Tesla owner is incapable of critical thought?

How is this a win?

Agree. It was a chore listening to it. Good it’s short.

Edit* it’s one of the pieces of literature that can’t be reviewed anymore. Like 1984.

1984 is good with the whole world building thing. The moment our protagonist falls in love and fuck the chick in that field its over.

As a consumer you should have thought about the consequences of your habits. Because of you they now have to replace all the vendig machines.

Its the consumers fault. Companies have absolutely no responsibility.

Huge /S if there ever was any doubt.

Go to Outlook. Open the global adress book. Its there on the top in alphabetical order.

[email protected]

Awesome cognitive detoration. Congratulations.

Its the same logic as cobcluding that people who draw swatikas on Tesla stores are amthe actual Nazis. You can’t comprehend any context.

Dude made some edgy youtube vids 8 years ago. Haven’t touched the topic since. Therefore he’s a nazi sympathizer?

Removed by mod

Its not a topic in this thread.

Im planning on upgrading my old TV soon. But a new one will not be connected to the internet during its lifetime. All useful services are available on more powerful and more intuitive devices anyway.

AI on TV is hopefully just the new 3d. Gone soon.

Yes. Attacking peoples appearance will surely teach the opposition not to do the same.

Perfectly executed strategy.

But I don’t want red to win. Fastest built straw man it gave you a whiplash too.

How did the party that’s supposed to care for American values end up supporting a candidate selling their values to the lowest bidder?

This has to be a simulation. I’m so confused.

You’re as reflected as a surface painted in Stuart Semple’s Black 3.0.

Defending a stance solely because it’s in your favour in this particular time isn’t a long term solution. It can shaft you and keep you shafted if the tide turns.

Having in place a system that allows for diversity should be in the interest of any democrat with an IQ above celcius room temperature. Gerrymandering onbtye other hand and other ways of manipulation is a more rational way of attacking the issue.

Yes. Earth. The planet with only one country.