That’s the scary part. There is a infinitely small probability that the state of maximum entropy will spontaneously organize in anything, right? Even into the exact form of you sitting in front of a computer and reading this comment. So on a infinite time scale at some point you will just pop out of nothing and suffocate in a vacuum, basically teleported from this very moment into future.

But not really because the universe as we understand it today has some limits on what it can organize itself into, right? So in the end we can end up with just cold emptiness forever. (if I understand all this correctly)

Of course, if we can prove those theories and we will know our universe will eventually give birth to a new one we won’t have to destroy it. But if we prove that the future is just infinite emptiness I think we should.

You really think the most powerful beings in the universe decide the fate of humanity based on my lemmy comments? Thanks. For a moment there I thought no one cares what I think.

“So the ultimate end of the universe comes much sooner than expected, but fortunately it still takes a very long time,”

I still think we should destroy it. We basically have to options here:

1. The universe decays and turns into huge, cold void that can’t support any life an last forever
2. We destroy it and hope that new universe will be created out of nothing again

Option 1 is certain death. With option 2 there’s at least some hope for a new beginning.

Of course we don’t have a way to destroy the universe yet but we have 10^78 years to figure it out. Once we have the means to start some chain reaction that rips space time itself and destroys the entire universe we should do it.

It’s not like the CEO will have to pay for this…

I remember reading that. It was 30 years ago so I may be remembering it wrong… We had this as a assigned reading in school but only the first chapter or something. It was in our textbook kind of as a short story. So we read only the part about the kid dying without knowing the story continues. I later found the entire book somewhere and kept reading and hey, the brothers met again in the magic world. I don’t remember them dying at the end or anything else for that matter. It was one of the least traumatizing books they assigned us. In most Polish books and novels some kid dies, or some animal dies, or there’s war, or concentration camps or some other torture.

Title?

I didn’t know that one. I use vi all the time but my brain can’t handle it in the command line. Two different muscle memories clash.

Here’s a real shell trick for you:

Remove the arrow keys from you keyboard for a month or two.

Seriously, do it. Do you know how to jump to the beginning of the line? The end? Move one word back? One character back? After a month without arrow keys you will know, trust me.

Thanks, for now that what I will try to do but using Netmaker. I think it’s an overkill for what I need but it will be good practice.

Netmaker looks really nice. Has the lowest requirement, self-hosted and open-source. I will give it a shot but if the setup is too complicated I will just go with separate profile and wireguard.

Alternatively, I guess you could also do “split-route” by defining different peers in your Android WireGuard app, and use different AllowedIPs for them.

That’s exactly what I’ve been trying but it doesn’t work. Only one peer is able to do a handshake. It looks like it should work but I actually haven’t seen anyone recommending this or saying they manged to set it up. Everyone just ends up routing everything through private VPN. I will read some more about tailscale but I think it’s an overkill for me. I will probably just use different VPNs in separate android profiles.

Looks like most people are doing some version of option 3, routing everything through home network. I hoped there’s a simpler way but maybe I just have to go in this direction.

One question, the VPN client on your router routes everything from your network or just the phone?

So you’re using tailscale android app as the only VPN and all traffic from your phone goes through your local network, yes?

Your tailscale exit node is deployed on some server in your network, right? (I’ve set up my WG server on my router) Does your router just port forward all tailscale traffic to it?

The Android limitation is exactly what I found - only one VPN at a time. I checked the work profile trick and it does work, I can have two VPNs running. This is not ideal as apps from one profile still won’t use the commercial VPN but maybe I can live with that. I will do some more testing. Thanks for the tip.

He just sells them drugs, they are not even friends.

That’s a weird statistic. This can simply mean that one guy is “in a relationship with an AI chatbot” and 1 in 5 boys know him.

The other day I put debian on my old dell and move my servarr apps there. Now I have a spare Linux set up box I don’t know what to do with. Old laptops are nice but you only need so many.

Yes, and using many closed source apps really feels like crawling through that pipe.

This sounds great. You still need a subscription to use it? I may be the thing that finally convinces me to get one.