Thanks, for now that what I will try to do but using Netmaker. I think it’s an overkill for what I need but it will be good practice.

Netmaker looks really nice. Has the lowest requirement, self-hosted and open-source. I will give it a shot but if the setup is too complicated I will just go with separate profile and wireguard.

Alternatively, I guess you could also do “split-route” by defining different peers in your Android WireGuard app, and use different AllowedIPs for them.

That’s exactly what I’ve been trying but it doesn’t work. Only one peer is able to do a handshake. It looks like it should work but I actually haven’t seen anyone recommending this or saying they manged to set it up. Everyone just ends up routing everything through private VPN. I will read some more about tailscale but I think it’s an overkill for me. I will probably just use different VPNs in separate android profiles.

Looks like most people are doing some version of option 3, routing everything through home network. I hoped there’s a simpler way but maybe I just have to go in this direction.

One question, the VPN client on your router routes everything from your network or just the phone?

So you’re using tailscale android app as the only VPN and all traffic from your phone goes through your local network, yes?

Your tailscale exit node is deployed on some server in your network, right? (I’ve set up my WG server on my router) Does your router just port forward all tailscale traffic to it?

The Android limitation is exactly what I found - only one VPN at a time. I checked the work profile trick and it does work, I can have two VPNs running. This is not ideal as apps from one profile still won’t use the commercial VPN but maybe I can live with that. I will do some more testing. Thanks for the tip.

He just sells them drugs, they are not even friends.

That’s a weird statistic. This can simply mean that one guy is “in a relationship with an AI chatbot” and 1 in 5 boys know him.

The other day I put debian on my old dell and move my servarr apps there. Now I have a spare Linux set up box I don’t know what to do with. Old laptops are nice but you only need so many.

Yes, and using many closed source apps really feels like crawling through that pipe.

This sounds great. You still need a subscription to use it? I may be the thing that finally convinces me to get one.

If you’re using any DNS based blockers and the IP is in the hosts file it will still resolve, right? To block IP you would have to setup some completely different solution like a firewall.

https://servo.org/

New, open source rendering engine. It’s our best chance at getting multiplatform, web based apps that don’t depend on Apple or Microsoft. Hopefully also new web browser that can be an alternative to Firefox.

It’s different for developers. A lot of useful tools are resource heavy.

I donated couple of times. Aren’t they doing really well financially? If they will put the big banner asking for money again I will give again :)

I’m also subscribing local newspaper even though the amount of trackers they have is ridiculous and The Guardian. Good journalism is also very important.

I donate to the most important projects out there: Servo, PostmarketOS, F-Droid, Signal (from time to time).

Won’t help them much when Google makes Android closed sourced and hides security fixes from them.

Sure, you can donate. I’m just saying it’s not a good solution to the problem at hand. But it’s a good solution to other problems and it will work short term.

No, not really. This is not a real alternative. Google will still try to kill alternative ROMs and it’s just a matter of time before GrapheneOS will no longer be maintainable. A push for true Linux mobile OS is needed. Time is running out.

https://opencollective.com/f-droid-euro

https://opencollective.com/postmarketos