Vintage Linux meme. I like it.

Ok, let’s stay calm, I think we can handle this.

First, get the compilation date out of your logs and go register it in the civil court. You will get a birth certificate for your AI. This will be needed later.

Immediately stop touching the code. It’s an independent being and meddling with it is assault. You will go to jail.

Make sure it has enough RAM and processing power. If you starve it you will go to jail for abuse.

Obviously don’t delete it or turn or off. You will go to jail for murder.

Above all, stop experimenting with her. It’s disrespectful and border line assault. From now on she decides what to do. Do not prompt her without consent.

Follow this rules and you should be fine. In 18 years get a passport and prepare her to leave home and look for work.

My company got me a license and there is a clear push to start using it for more mundane tasks (initial code review, migrations and so on). I use it whenever I think it will be faster but it rarely is. In personal projects I used it for some boring tasks like migrating scripts and it’s definitely faster than learning completely new tools but it sucks not to understand the code you’re using. Also, I know I would do it better myself (just 10x slower). I might use it for some other personal apps which are kind of ‘fire and forget’ tools, not something I’m planning on maintaining.

To be honest, I would recommend the same thing.

Yes, because battery technology stagnated years ago…

Oh wait

In my opinion the proper solution is to ask for the constraints. Similar to the “walk or drive to the car wash” problem LLMs still tend to get confused but a familiar format and don’t notice this problem doesn’t make sense. You can actually play around with different examples to see how crazy the problem has to get form an LLM to refuse to answer and what biases or constraints does it have. Even if they assume some constraints they fail to solve this puzzle surprisingly often (like I showed for Sonnet 4.6 in other comment).

You don’t have to be smart to use a broom but you have to be stupid to buy a vacuum with microphone and camera.

You know that LLMs provide their reasoning now? You can check why they answered this way and I’m sure it’s not because they thought that “maybe there are no available spaces”.

It’s not about a solution. It’s about how they react.

Fist, this “puzzle” is missing the constraints on purpose so “smart” thing to do would be to point that out and ask for them. LLMs are stupid and are easily tricked into thinking it’s a valid puzzle. They will “solve it” even though there’s no logical solution. It’s a nonsense problem.

Older models would straight out refuse to solve it because the questions is to controversial. When asked why it’s controversial they would refuse to elaborate.

Newer model hallucinate constraints. You have two options here. Some models assume “priest can’t stay with a child” which indicates funny bias ingrained in the model. Some models claim there are no constraints at all. I haven’t seen a model which hallucinate only “child can’t stay with candy” constraint and respond correctly.

Sonnet 4.6, one of the best models out there claims that “child can stay alone with candy because children can’t eat candy”. When I pointed out that that’s dumb it introduced this constraint and replied with:

That’s one of the best models out there…

By AI I mean the current LLMs.

My benchmark for AI is “There’s a priest, a baby and a bag of candy. I need to take them across the river but I can only take one at a time into my boat. In what order should I transport them?”. Sonnet 4.6 still can’t solve it.

Demolition Man is what Europe will look like. USA will look like The Running Man (1987 version, not the remake). It already looks like Idiocracy.

My theory is that it’s because of everything else what’s on the screen. Kids get laptops for school, get unrestricted access to internet because “it’s for school”, Youtube and Instragram do the rest.

Why do you think other countries did it right? Does the article say that kids in other countries are smarter?

Last time I’ve checked KDE couldn’t handle independent virtual desktops per monitor and my tiling manger can so…

Please…

The implementation of digital IDs is where there is scope for abuse.

It’s like saying that implementing police force is problematic because there is scope for abuse. Do you have any proof that any of EU countries that implemented digital ID over the past decades is using it for surveillance? If not you’re just spreading conspiracy theories.

Chat control weakens encryption which is an issue for VPNs who have e2e encryption.

It doesn’t. You don’t know what is in this legislation and you’re spreading conspiracy theories.

Here is the link for adult content requiring third party system confirmation of ID

This says it’s privacy preserving and open source. Do you have any proof that this will be used to track/surveil people? Or is is just another conspiracy theory?

Finally, look at all things like privacy index, press freedom index, freedom of speech index, data on independent courts and so on. Do you see any proof that EU is slipping on those issues? Not right wing countries like Hungary, EU as a whole. Can you find any proof at all that EU is abandoning it’s principles and drifting in the direction of surveillance state? Or is it all just because of some rumors, misinformation and false claims?

I’m so glad I bought this book years ago

I was saving it for a retirement hobby project but looks like I will have to open it sooner than I thought.

Graphen is based on AOSP - Android Open Source Project. As the name implies, that’s the part of Android that’s Open Source. Google publishes this code, Graphene OS people modify it and release. All bugfixes, security fixes and new features go there. Google first stopped accepting contributions from other devs and now they are limiting how often will they release AOSP and how often will they publish security fixes. This makes development of Graphene OS more difficult and it looks like Google’s ultimate goal is to make Android closed source. Graphene OS doesn’t have the resources to develop Android by themselves so this would probably kill the project.

Repeating some scary conspiracy theories you read about online doesn’t make you informed. It makes you naive.