It’s not about a solution. It’s about how they react.

Fist, this “puzzle” is missing the constraints on purpose so “smart” thing to do would be to point that out and ask for them. LLMs are stupid and are easily tricked into thinking it’s a valid puzzle. They will “solve it” even though there’s no logical solution. It’s a nonsense problem.

Older models would straight out refuse to solve it because the questions is to controversial. When asked why it’s controversial they would refuse to elaborate.

Newer model hallucinate constraints. You have two options here. Some models assume “priest can’t stay with a child” which indicates funny bias ingrained in the model. Some models claim there are no constraints at all. I haven’t seen a model which hallucinate only “child can’t stay with candy” constraint and respond correctly.

Sonnet 4.6, one of the best models out there claims that “child can stay alone with candy because children can’t eat candy”. When I pointed out that that’s dumb it introduced this constraint and replied with:

That’s one of the best models out there…

By AI I mean the current LLMs.

My benchmark for AI is “There’s a priest, a baby and a bag of candy. I need to take them across the river but I can only take one at a time into my boat. In what order should I transport them?”. Sonnet 4.6 still can’t solve it.

Demolition Man is what Europe will look like. USA will look like The Running Man (1987 version, not the remake). It already looks like Idiocracy.

My theory is that it’s because of everything else what’s on the screen. Kids get laptops for school, get unrestricted access to internet because “it’s for school”, Youtube and Instragram do the rest.

Why do you think other countries did it right? Does the article say that kids in other countries are smarter?

Last time I’ve checked KDE couldn’t handle independent virtual desktops per monitor and my tiling manger can so…

Please…

The implementation of digital IDs is where there is scope for abuse.

It’s like saying that implementing police force is problematic because there is scope for abuse. Do you have any proof that any of EU countries that implemented digital ID over the past decades is using it for surveillance? If not you’re just spreading conspiracy theories.

Chat control weakens encryption which is an issue for VPNs who have e2e encryption.

It doesn’t. You don’t know what is in this legislation and you’re spreading conspiracy theories.

Here is the link for adult content requiring third party system confirmation of ID

This says it’s privacy preserving and open source. Do you have any proof that this will be used to track/surveil people? Or is is just another conspiracy theory?

Finally, look at all things like privacy index, press freedom index, freedom of speech index, data on independent courts and so on. Do you see any proof that EU is slipping on those issues? Not right wing countries like Hungary, EU as a whole. Can you find any proof at all that EU is abandoning it’s principles and drifting in the direction of surveillance state? Or is it all just because of some rumors, misinformation and false claims?

I’m so glad I bought this book years ago

I was saving it for a retirement hobby project but looks like I will have to open it sooner than I thought.

Graphen is based on AOSP - Android Open Source Project. As the name implies, that’s the part of Android that’s Open Source. Google publishes this code, Graphene OS people modify it and release. All bugfixes, security fixes and new features go there. Google first stopped accepting contributions from other devs and now they are limiting how often will they release AOSP and how often will they publish security fixes. This makes development of Graphene OS more difficult and it looks like Google’s ultimate goal is to make Android closed source. Graphene OS doesn’t have the resources to develop Android by themselves so this would probably kill the project.

Repeating some scary conspiracy theories you read about online doesn’t make you informed. It makes you naive.

I recently learned to make traditional Balearic slings. I’m ready.

Act if you want to, no one is stopping you. For me it’s just silly that people talk about EU becoming surveillance state without being able to show a single valid example. Like when you said EU is blocking porn and VPN access. I’m still waiting for examples where it was done inside EU. Then everyone claims digital IDs are evil without realizing they have been used without issues in EU for 20 years. It’s like saying that EU will become a military dictatorship because countries have guns.

Porn blocking? In EU? I heard about it only in UK. Which EU countries block porn?

ID implementation… yes, all EU countries have ID. Many have digital IDs. What’s with it?

VPN discussion isn’t really proof of anything. Even Chat Control 2.0 isn’t approved yet, it’s just a project. VPN blocking is not even a proposal. It just someone mentioned in some report. Hardly a reason to claim that EU is becoming a surveillance state.

Chat Control is not implementing mass surveillance and has nothing to do with national security. I that’s their only argument they are confused and there’s nothing to talk about. If they have other arguments I would like to hear them.

What are you basing this on? If you say “Chat Control” I will just ignore you.

It’s the other way around. GrapheneOS users will be able to install all the apps but stock Android users will not be able to install apps from F-Droid and other alternative sources*. F-Droid will lose access to about 99% of the market.

*Technically it will still be possible for open source devs to distribute apps to stock Android users but it will require handing Google your personal information and setting up way more complicated build configuration.

Nothing changes for now but other moves by Google clearly show they are trying to kill 3rd party ROMs by locking down Android’s code. In my opinion, unless EU steps in and mandates phone manufacturers and Google to support google free apps we’re fucked.

All this data and more is publicly available in many countries.